CONTENTS
Introduction to Elon Musk's Political Involvement
Rich Influence on Politics and Media
Examples of Political Influence
Inequality and Loss of Political Influence
Tesla and Trump: Accessing Taxpayer Money
Musk's Support of Far-Right Parties
Economic Downtrend and Political Tension
The Strategic Use of Immigration
Conservative Party Tactics and Brexit
Conclusion: Fighting Inequality
Below is a transcript of another video, a follow-up to MINDSET OF THE RICH. I let AI organize the transcript into paragraphs and to make the headings for each paragraph. Hopefully, it did a proper job of it. Offhand, it looks okay, but I didn’t delve deep.
Introduction to Elon Musk's Political Involvement
Okay. Welcome back to Gary's Economics. Today we are going to talk about Elon Musk. Okay. So for those of you who don't know, Elon Musk is the world's richest man. And he is the owner of Twitter and Tesla. And he has recently made his big entrance to politics supporting Donald Trump aggressively. Donald Trump, of course, won the election. It looks like he will give Elon Musk an official role in the US government, and he has started intervening quite aggressively in politics and a lot of countries, including here in the UK, but also all across Europe, generally supporting the anti-immigrant, far right, right wing parties. And we're going to talk today about what we can learn from that, from this, this movement of Elon Musk into politics.
The Impact of the Super Rich
So I think the first thing which we can learn about this maneuver from Elon Musk is, I think it's a really good demonstration of something which I've been trying to educate, trying to illustrate a lot on this channel, which is that when the super rich get really, really rich, that doesn't not affect you. It has an impact on you. On this channel, we talk a lot about the need to tax the rich more in order to protect living standards. And we often get the pushback, that's the politics of envy. You shouldn't tax the rich. It doesn't matter if rich people get rich. We should focus on getting rich ourselves. The rich being rich doesn't affect us. And this is a really good example of why the rich being super rich does affect you.
Competition for Resources
The rich get richer and richer and richer and ordinary people owning fewer and fewer assets. That affects you because the rich are competing for the same resources that you need. There's only a certain amount of things in the economy, only certain amount of housing, only a certain amount of education, universities, doctors, dentists, physical space in the cities. As the rich get aggressively richer, they start to consume more stuff. And that means less stuff for you and the way that you normally see that is, for example, housing in the cities gets more expensive. That's because the rich are consuming more. The rich are richer, they can pay more, they push the prices up. But it's not just housing. right. It's the same with, for example, university education, access to doctors, access to dentists, access to space in the cities. You know, you see here in London, we see a lot of pubs closing down. They're being replaced by generally housing. Whereas if you go into the center of the city, luxury hotels, luxury restaurants, theaters, they're booming. They're doing better than ever. What you're seeing here is the rich competing with you for space, out competing with you. And the result is you get less space. And the way that you see that is generally the prices of things that you buy are going up.
Rich Influence on Politics and Media
And I think with this Elon Musk case, we start to see another example of this, which is the rich are also competing with you for essentially the ownership of your politics, your politicians and your media. And this has always been the case. It's the case also for economists. So I studied economics when I was a teenager at the London School of Economics, which was... which still is a big elite university here in London. And I got very good grades there. And I had a choice when I went to graduate. Who do you want to work for? Do I want to work for the government? Trying to help the economy? Trying to support the economy for ordinary people, getting paid , , grand a year? Or do I want to work managing the money of the rich, getting paid or million pounds a year? And it's not just bankers, right? It's the same for dentists. It's the same for doctors. I went to a grammar school and a lot of my friends are dentists and they can work in the NHS, or they can do botox to rich people, and they can get paid or times as much, right. But it's also the same for politicians.
Examples of Political Influence
And I'm always reminded of David Cameron. So I think the Prime Minister of the UK gets paid something like £, a year. I think that's the salary. David Cameron after he left office, he went to work for a finance company called Greensill. And I think within the first year he made something like £ million. Now I want you to ask yourself, why does a finance company pay David Cameron £ million one year after he leaves office? Is David Cameron an excellent trader? Is he an excellent financial analyst? If your politicians are getting paid grand a year, grand a year by the people, and they can also get paid £ million a year to work for the rich. Who do you think the politicians really work for?
Rishi Sunak and Family Wealth
I'm also reminded of Rishi Sunak Right. Rishi Sunak is a really interesting example because his father in law is one of the richest people in the entire world. He's a billionaire, so he's... the money which Rishi Sunak gets to be prime minister is absolutely, totally irrelevant to him.... But the money that his family will get from his father in law, that is clearly enormously his major financial interest. Right. So you’ve got to ask yourself then, when somebody like Rishi Sunak is deciding things like, how should we set tax policy? How should we tax rich people? Do you think he speaks to his father in law? When David Cameron knows that when he leaves office, he's going to work for Greensill and get paid £ million in one year, when he's making these decisions, do you think he speaks to the guys at Greensill who are going to pay him £ million?
Competition for Politicians
So in the case of doctors, dentists, universities, but also economists, also politicians, you are in a competition. The politicians can make a certain amount of money working for you, and they can make a certain amount of money working for the rich. And when the rich are super, super, super, super rich and your average taxpayer is increasingly poor, it gets harder and harder and harder for you to compete with them. And I think this is the reason why we saw for long, long periods of time, really high amounts of corruption in poor countries because the local people of those countries can't afford to pay their politicians very much, whereas extremely wealthy people in other countries can pay these politicians enormous amounts to basically give the resources of those countries to these wealthy people. And I think this thing which has been happening in poor countries for a long time, you know, if you speak to people from sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, a lot of places in Asia, that they've been seeing this kind of corruption for a long time, in the West we've been relatively protected by that for a reasonable amount of time, because we've had a wealthy taxpayer, and we haven't had these super wealthy foreign billionaires who can influence our politics.
Inequality and Loss of Political Influence
As inequality has increased, the taxpayer, ordinary families have become poorer, the superrich have become richer, and you have basically found yourself in the same situation that Latin Americans and Africans have been in for a long period of time. You cannot compete anymore for ownership of your politicians with the super rich, and I think this is a classic example of why inequality matters for you. Because if you allow the super rich to get even richer and you allow the middle class to lose their assets, they will increasingly outcompete you for the things that you need. And that includes your politicians and includes your media as well, it includes your media as well.
Media Bias and Influence
Now, if we consider the media, if you work as a journalist, you need to be paid. Most people need to be paid. They've got to pay the rent. They've got to pay their bills. There's two ways you can be paid as a journalist, right? You can sell journalism, sell news to the people, or you can sell your services to the rich and say, if you pay me, I will sell stories that promote the ideas that you want to promote. You know, if you are an American watching this channel, you'll be very aware of where that ends up. You end up with extremely biased media. Their job is not to tell you the truth, their job is to sell a certain story for you because they get paid by very rich people who want you to believe certain things. So this is the effect of inequality. This is the effect of inequality. This is... this Musk thing makes it really, really clear how inequality affects you. If you allow the rich to get really, really rich to get really, really powerful, they outbid you for control of your politicians. They outbid you for control of your media, and they outbid you for access to your resources. And then what you get is politicians who don't care about you, media who lies to you, and the inability to access resources, which includes things like food and housing.
Tesla and Trump: Accessing Taxpayer Money
And where does that lead us? As soon as Donald Trump won the election, Tesla stock price doubled. Tesla's stock price doubled. Why did Tesla's stock price double when Donald Trump won the election? Because traders think that Donald Trump is going to use taxpayer money. Your money if you're an American to give to Tesla and to give to Elon Musk. That is what inequality does. Inequality gives the rich the power to directly access your tax dollars. That is the end result. That is why you need to care about inequality. That is why you need to care about the distribution of wealth. That is why you need to care about the distribution of power. Okay, so that's my first point done. Elon Musk makes it really clear that inequality affects you in a material way.
Musk's Support of Far-Right Parties
The second point, I wanted to talk a little bit about Elon Musk's support of far right parties across the world. When I say far right, what I mean is anti-immigration parties. I know some people don't like the term far right. Why is Elon Musk supporting anti-immigration parties all around the world?... And to me, this is... it's really, really obvious why he comes in and supports that. And I want to talk a little bit about it, because I never hear this discussed really in the media.
Economic Downtrend and Political Tension
So on this channel I talk a lot about, and I have been talking a lot about for a long time, the fact that the economy is going to keep getting worse, living standards will keep falling. It'll be difficult for you to get financial security, to get good quality housing, to get good quality jobs. And because inequality will keep rising, that will keep getting worse. And I think when I first started saying that, you know, and I first like betting on this back in , that was a really not popular opinion. There was a general sort of consideration that the economy was getting better and it would recover. It would get better. Now, as I say this, at the beginning of.... at the beginning of , I think it's becoming increasingly obvious to people who are watching that, that is what is happening. The economy is on a structural downtrend. Things are going to get worse and worse. And as that happens, it creates an obvious tension in politics, which is that people do not want to accept the situation where their family gets poorer every generation. People don't want their kids to be poorer than they are. People don't want their grandkids to live in poverty and people demand change in politics.
Demand for Change
And I think whilst a lot of these kind of old school politicians cling on to this hope that we can keep going the way we're going, it's becoming increasingly obvious to anybody, kind of half smart, that people are going to increasingly demand some kind of change. What that means is we're kind of already in a situation now in our society where there has to be a discussion and there is already discussion about where do we go, how do we change things. And I think in the next ten years, probably, maybe sooner, you will see a significant change in the way our politics is run, what politicians offer and what people demand. And that is because the status quo is increasingly obviously not working for most people.
Musk's Reflex Reaction
So if you're somebody like Elon Musk and you are the richest person in the entire world, you're going to look at a changing world and you're going to look at people that are demanding different things. You're going to look at people who, people like me who are demanding less inequality, higher taxation of the rich, lower taxation of ordinary workers. And there's an obvious reflex reaction for somebody like Elon Musk where he says, well, I don't want to pay higher taxes. So I want to avoid this outcome of higher taxes on the rich. So you need to sell a different story. And I think it's... it's already really clear what the big alternative stories are. Our story, which is getting bigger, the reason you're getting poorer is because of the super rich, need to tax the super rich more. But there's one story which is much bigger than that, which is the reason you’re poor is because of immigrants. The reason you’re poor is because of foreigners.
Immigrants as a Scapegoat
And if you are Elon Musk, you're looking out there in the world of, you know, new alternative economic ideas. Which one of those ideas do you want to win? Now, I would like to make it clear, I think a sensible billionaire would probably realise it's economically destabilising to keep inequality growing more and more. But most billionaires don't think like that. They just don't want to pay higher taxes. They want to keep getting richer. They're kind of obsessed with it. That's why they get rich. So what are you going to do? You are going to financially support the idea that immigrants are the problem.
Self-Interest of the Rich
And I'm not... I think sometimes people think that I'm some sort of super pro-immigration guy. I'm not a super pro-immigration guy. I recognise that it is massively in the interests of the rich to tell you that the problem is immigrants, because if you don't think the problem is immigrants, you might work out that the reason you're getting poor is because of the super rich, and they don't want you to know that. So this is the situation Elon Musk is in. He's going to support that. And it's the truth is, and something increasingly worries me, it's not just Elon Musk is going to support that. You know, other super rich people are going to support this idea because they realise that hatred of foreigners and hatred of immigrants is the main thing standing between them and high levels of taxation, and they don't want to pay more tax. So they're going to fund it, they're going to fund these ideas. And more and more money is going to flood into that.
Stabilizing the Economy
If inequality keeps increasing and keeps increasing and keeps increasing, living standards will get worse and worse and worse and worse. It will be extremely destabilising, and it will destabilise an economy which already provides unbelievable levels of luxury to the rich and the super rich. I don't think this is the right thing for billionaires to do. You know, there's this story, I don't know how true it is, that the reason that the French cut off the heads of the rich and the English didn't is because the English accepted... the English super rich accepted... they need to give a bit back, and they gave a little bit back to ordinary people.... They increased living standards of ordinary people. And apparently that's why we still have a royal family. And the French royal familiar are all dead. I think a sensible billionaire would accept that if they stop inequality from increasing, we can stabilise this fall in living standards. And they can protect their own situation. But the fact is, most super rich don't think like that. They very simplistically want to keep their taxes down.
The Strategic Use of Immigration
I wanted to talk a little bit about where that puts these guys, people like Musk, who are funding and increasingly funding anti-immigrant political parties, anti-immigrant ideas because what is interesting is it is in their interests for people to hate foreigners and for people to hate migrants, and for people to think that migration is the key problem. But it is, interestingly, also in their interests to keep migration high because what these guys primarily need is for you to hate migrants and for you to think migration is the problem. And the best way for them to achieve that is to have loads of stuff in the media saying migrants are the problem and also to have really high levels of immigration, because if immigration is really low, first of all, it will rapidly become clear that that didn't stop the economy from getting worse. But secondly, it's a lot easier to get people to hate migrants when there's loads of migrants coming all the time. And that is why you see Trump in this really interesting situation where he's simultaneously funding anti-migrant parties and arguing that we need to have high levels of immigration in the US.
Conservative Party Tactics and Brexit
And it really, really reminds me of what the Conservatives did when they were in power. So the Conservatives, and I think this is the smartest thing they did, and I'm surprised in a way that they've got people smart enough to do this. The Conservatives really, really fought hard to have a specific kind of migrant kicked out of the country, which was illegal migrants coming over in small boats. At the same time, the Conservatives did Brexit. Before Brexit, the UK has to accept EU migrants. There's a degree to which the UK doesn't control the level of immigration, of legal immigration. After Brexit, the UK can choose how much legal immigration it has.
Legal vs. Illegal Immigration
So the Conservative Party basically had complete power over the vast majority of migration, illegal migration is only, I think, or % of overall immigration, %, % is legal migration, which they could have reduced. But they didn't. They did this really interesting thing of really aggressively trying to stop this really small kind of immigration that they couldn't actually stop, and massively increasing the number of visas, which they gave legally to non EU immigrants.
The Billionaire's Playbook
It was like super, super smart. They managed to simultaneously portray themselves as the party of low migration whilst massively increasing non-EU migration to the country. And I think this kind of shows you in a way, what the correct tactical play is from the billionaires. Tell you to hate migrants, and make sure there's tons of immigration, because that makes you hate people, that makes you hate immigrants. And I think the final thing that we learn from Elon Musk is basically how important it is for billionaires, that you guys hate each other. So what I try to do on this channel is to make it clear to you that the reason you're getting poorer is because inequality is rapidly increasing. If you don't stop inequality rapidly increasing, you will keep getting poorer.
The Power of Unity
The only way you can really protect yourselves is by working together as a mass of not super rich people. And using that political power, that only works if you guys don't hate each other. And every week I put these videos out and I get people in the comments saying that's never going to work. People are never going to work together. Tell me how I can protect myself. Tell me what I can do. Give me trading tips. Told me how I can protect myself.
The Squid Game Analogy
Rising inequality, rising top % inequality, means more and more and more of you lose every year. There's no way to change that other than stopping inequality from rising. I think what people like Elon Musk want is for you guys all to be living in this Squid Game where you all think, I don't care if only one of us will win and % of us will lose. I want to fight the people around me to be in that %. You need to change the game. You need to change the game. You cannot play a game where every single year, % of you lose, % of you lose, % of you lose, and you keep hoping to be in that %. You need to change the rules of the game, and that means working together.
Conclusion: Fighting Inequality
So to conclude, Elon Musk is a great example of why inequality is a danger for you and your family. These guys are going to take the things that you need. They're going to take your politicians, your economists, your media, and ultimately your housing and your food. That is what it means. You need to fight inequality. The only way to do that is to work together. That's why these billionaires want you to hate each other. If you hate each other, they’ll win. If you work together, you can win. Support the channel, tax the rich, cut tax on ordinary working people. Send this to your friends, send this to your mum.